Published on:

As early as 2010, reports of dangerous fractures and migrations in inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were being made public. The FDA issued a safety warning regarding these devices, stating it had received nearly 1,000 adverse event reports since 2005. Our team of IVC filter lawyers details the dangers of these filters and pending litigation against the manufacturers.

ivc-filter-lawsuitIVC filters are small, cage-like medical devices implanted into the large vein that carries blood from the lower body to the heart. They are designed to capture blood clots before they reach the lungs, heart or brain. These filters are implanted in patients, either temporarily or permanently, who are not able to receive other blood-thinning treatments.

Continue reading

Published on:

XRaysFive years ago, the inventor of a popular surgical device requested that hospitals stop using his device because he believed it posed a danger to patients. The device, a heated blanket that keeps patients warm during implant surgeries, is now linked to severe joint infections. Our teams of hip and knee replacement lawyers are now accepting cases of infection and revision surgery from this device.

Continue reading

Published on:

136253877996hg6Motorola employees recently filed suit for their exposure to toxic substances in manufacturing facilities, resulting in birth defects to their children and other conditions. Another suit was filed by a man employed in the plastics industry after he was diagnosed with leukemia. Toxic exposure lawyers at Pintas & Mullins detail these two cases and others like it we are currently handling.

About 13 plaintiffs are currently joined in the Motorola suit, claiming that the company routinely ignored scientific research and government warnings about the safety of various chemicals in its manufacturing facilities. Because of its negligence, Motorola employees were exposed to various toxic substances such as arsenic, radiation, ethylene glycol ethers, and fluorine compounds.

This is the fifth toxic exposure lawsuit filed against Motorola since 2011. This specific lawsuit claims the exposure caused birth defects such as hearing loss, asthma, Down syndrome, and ADHD among other conditions. The plaintiffs worked at Motorola’s manufacturing facilities at various times from 1965 to 2001.

Continue reading

Published on:

XrayOur team of uterine cancer lawyers report on a settlement recently reached between a power morcellator manufacturer and a man whose wife died from uterine cancer. The woman died less than one year after undergoing a hysterectomy using a power morcellator.

The plaintiff, a 53-year-old widower named Scott Burkhart, filed suit against Lina Medical ApS after he learned that the power morcellator used during his wife’s hysterectomy caused her hidden cancer to fatally spread. His wife, Donna, died in 2013 just 11 months after undergoing the hysterectomy for heavy bleeding. She was unaware she had cancerous cells before undergoing the surgery.

Continue reading

Published on:

hip-joint-aseptic-loosening-ar1938-1_lHip replacement parts made by Zimmer were recently recalled because of serious adverse effects in patients. The company’s femoral stems and necks were defectively made so that excess metals can infect patient’s blood, bone and nearby tissue after implantation. Hip implant lawyers at Pintas & Mullins report on this recall below.

The recalled products’ official name is the Zimmer M/L Taper with Kinectiv Technology Prosthesis Femoral Stems and Necks. These parts are made from a specific metal alloy blend called Tivanium, which is titanium enriched with nitrogen. Tivanium is supposed to have minimal particulate release, making it safe even for patients who are extraordinarily metal-sensitive.

Many patients have true metal allergies, which can present serious problems when they require hip or knee implants. According to a paper by a Seattle joint surgeon, patients receiving Tivanium implants perform quite well and do not have issues with metal sensitivity.

In early May 2015, Zimmer found process monitoring failures in its Tivanium hip implant manufacturing. These failures caused high amounts of metal residue on the implants, which can leak out into patients, resulting in various side effects, such as:

  • Infection
  • Pain
  • Device failure and forced revision surgery
  • Allergic reactions, or metallosis
  • Death

Continue reading

Published on:

child on bikeAs spring moves into summer, children and teens head outside to bike, play sports and be active. By June each year, pediatric doctors typically treat double the patients as they do in the winter months. Accident and injury lawyers at Pintas & Mullins highlight the most dangerous activities and how to prevent brain injuries, broken bones, and other serious injuries.

Injuries start increasing in April, when winter begins to subside, with most injuries occurring in children aged eight to eleven. Pediatricians note that adolescents are more vulnerable to injuries during periods of rapid growth, because bones have special areas of cartilage (called growth plates) during this time to allow the bone to grow. Hormones produced during this time also render growth plates weaker than normal, making injuries even more likely.

Fortunately, children heal much faster than adults due to better circulation and constant bone production. Children who specialize in a specific sport often over-train certain muscle groups, increasing the risk of injury. In particular, much attention has been brought on mild and traumatic brain injuries in young athletes.

Forearms injuries are the most common injuries seen in ER and urgent care clinics, normally from playground and sports injuries, when kids stick out their arms to catch their fall. Scooter and bicycle injuries are also extremely common, along with trampoline injuries and foot injuries from wearing inadequate shoes.

Continue reading

Published on:

hospital bedA patient suffering severe vein damage by a surgical robot recently sued the robot’s manufacturer for marketing a defective device and improperly training physicians who use it. Surgical robot injury lawyers at Pintas & Mullins detail this case and others like it we are currently handling.

This case was filed by a woman who underwent a myomectomy, a minimally-invasive surgery to remove uterine fibroids. Her surgeon used the da Vinci Surgical System, which is a remotely-controlled robotic system made by Intuitive Surgical. The doctor performed the surgery under the guidance of an Intuitive Surgical representative, Jeanette Lee, who is also named in the suit.

During the procedure the surgeon was having trouble operating the system and asked Lee for permission to switch to a traditional open procedure. Lee instructed the doctor not to switch, which is why she is named in this lawsuit. The patient suffered extensive vein damage during the surgery causing her severe pain and forced additional surgeries.

The patient’s husband claims the defective robot deprived him of consortium of his wife, as she remains disabled and unable to work. The plaintiffs claim Intuitive promotes the da Vinci System to consumers and doctors but has failed to test its long-term impacts. They also claim Intuitive improperly trains doctors on how to use the system, resulting in complications ranging from burns and tears to sepsis, organ damage and even death.

Hundreds of thousands of surgeries are performed using robots every year, with Intuitive enjoying billions in revenue. The company aggressively markets the system, pitting hospitals against each other in a race to score the next ‘it’ innovation. As the da Vinci’s popularity grows, however, so do reports of patients injuries and questions over the system’s actual safety.

Intuitive faces mounting litigation for injuries caused by the da Vinci robots; even the company’s investors have filed suit over a defect in the surgical equipment. Investors claimed the company made false financial reports in failing to warn investors about the defect. The defect caused patients to be electrocuted during surgery.

Intuitive was unaware of the defects until doctors and hospitals started filing reports of patient injuries. The company then issued secret recalls to correct the problems, resulting in an FDA safety probe in January 2013.

Myomectomy Risks

A different federal agency, the FBI, is investigating another medical device manufacturer – Johnson & Johnson – for a different device commonly used in myomectomies. We have written extensively on power morcellators and their ability to spread uterine cancer and we are currently accepting cases of uterine cancer from myomectomies and hysterectomies.

Continue reading

Published on:

woman-in-hospital-1051476-m.jpgThousands of women who underwent fibroid removal surgery or hysterectomies are suffering from late-stage cancer from a device used in their surgeries. Now, device manufacturers are facing liability as these women and their families file suit. Our team of uterine and ovarian cancer lawyers is constantly updating our clients as soon as new information becomes available.

The device at issue is called a power morcellator, which many top American hospitals and health insurance companies have now banned. These bans were based largely on FDA warnings on the use of power morcellators in gynecological procedures, confirming that they may spread undiagnosed uterine tumors and should not be used on most women.

HCA Holdings, Aetna, and several other insurers and hospitals have dropped use of the device. Aetna is the country’s third-largest insurer, with about 23 million health members. Power morcellation will no longer be covered under most circumstances; doctors will have to get prior approval for any procedure using the device. Exceptions include women who could suffer severe, life-threatening complications from alternative methods.

Power morcellators work to remove fibroids or the uterus by cutting them into tiny pieces to be removed through minimally-invasive incisions. However, uterine fibroids can contain cancerous cells and tumors that cannot be detected prior to surgery. If a power morcellator breaks up a fibroid that contains cancer cells, the cancer is then spread throughout the uterus, abdomen and pelvis.

Cancer spread significantly lowers the chance of survival, rendering an otherwise benign cancer contained within the uterus into a ravenous late-stage illness affecting multiple organs. The FDA estimates that about one in every 350 women undergoing fibroid surgery has cancer cells hidden in fibroids.

Olympus Sued for Morcellator Cancer Spread

After this came to light in 2014 Johnson & Johnson pulled its power morcellators from global markets. Although J&J was the largest morcellator manufacturer, other companies have kept their devices on market. One of these companies, Olympus America, was recently hit with lawsuits by women who developed cancer from morcellation surgery.

The women claim Olympus should have been aware of the cancer risks of its device, the PKS PlasmaSORD Bipolar Morcellator. They argue there was medical evidence available to Olympus, yet the company failed to respond to published studies and reports describing the risk of spreading and worsening cancer with morcellator use.

Plaintiffs point to articles published in medical journals in the 1990s that illuminate the potential for morcellators to spread cancer tissue. They argue that Olympus made it difficult for patients to know about these risks, misrepresenting the device as totally safe. Misrepresenting the device this way prevented doctors from screening for and diagnosing cancer, further worsening patient survival rates.

Still, some doctors continue to encourage the continued use of morcellators. Many doctors believe that the decision to use a morcellator should lie with the patient and her doctor and that banning them completely would be a disservice to certain patients.

This, on paper, seems a fair and reasonable argument. In reality, however, patients are not always fully informed on the true risks of their options and doctors do not always have time to make sure women completely understand the procedure, its alternatives, and their unique risks versus benefits.
Continue reading

Published on:

surgeon-274997-m.jpgThe TigerPaw System has been recalled after reports of heart tissue tears and severe bleeding. More than 4,000 devices, commonly used during open heart surgery, were recalled after dozens of injuries and one death. Medical device lawyers at Pintas & Mullins detail this recall below.

The device is manufactured by Maquet Medical Systems and is most commonly used to obstruct the left atrial appendage during surgery. Recently, Maquet has received reports that the device has been tearing the appendage, causing serious bleeding. This recall is considered a Class I, the most serious of its kind.

The FDA has documented many violations at Maquet in the past few years, resulting in five Class I recalls and 40 other recalls between 2009 and 2014. These violations also led to a $6 million settlement in February 2015, which stemmed from a federal lawsuit accusing Maquet of maintaining poor quality standards.

At least one of Maquet’s products involved with that settlement was associated with a suspicious patient death. The FDA requested the company stop production on several devices after its inspections, including hernia meshes and vascular grafts and patches.

Lawsuits from Defective Medical Devices

The medical device industry reaps sales of more than $85 billion per year, and companies have the legal and ethical responsibility to ensure their devices are safe and effective. When the device is designed or manufactured improperly, or if the approval process was flawed, patients can be subject to serious injury or even death from complications.

If an injured patient decides to sue the medical device manufacturer for negligence, it is considered a product liability lawsuit. Any and all companies that manufacture products are responsible for making a safe product; therefore, the company could be liable for any injuries caused by defects or a dangerous design.

Companies are also required to warn the public about the risks associated with their products. Unfortunately, device manufacturers try to get new innovations onto market as soon as possible, often failing to adequately test for long-term complications and other serious side effects. Product liability lawsuits fall under three general categories:

1. Manufacturing defects – this applies if the design and promotions of the device were proper, but there were flaws in the manufacturing process causing the product to be defective.

2. Design defects – if the original design of the product can cause serious injury or death.

3. Marketing defects – if the company improperly markets the products, either failing to warn the public about the risks or by giving inadequate instructions to physicians.

A great example of the third type of claim is the recent deadly outbreak from a particular kind of medical device called a duodenoscope. Hundreds of patients have been infected by this medical scope and dozens have died. The duodenoscopes can infect patients with a “super bug”, or drug-resistant bacteria that can be fatal in vulnerable patients.

The devices were contaminated with this super bug because they were not properly cleaned by hospital staff. Duodenoscopes are supposed to be cleaned and disinfected with a special machine, though the instructions provided by the device manufacturer are inadequate. This makes it difficult to fully disinfect the device, causing dangerous bacteria to be transferred between patients.
Continue reading

Published on:

forklift-1-1125238-m.jpgIllinois ranks seventh in the nation for workers’ compensation system costs. Newly-elected Governor Bruce Rauner recently announced sweeping changes to the state workers’ compensation laws, as part of his pro-business agenda. Our team of workers’ compensation lawyers explains the serious consequences of these proposals.

Major business groups have a strident ally in Bruce Rauner, who has spent his career in private equity, buying companies and squeezing them of their assets. This is no secret, and many Illinoisans voted for Rauner based on his perceived business savvy, in hopes he could help lead us out of our financial crisis.

Instead, he has made sweeping proposals aimed against labor unions, trial lawyers, Medicare and Medcaid, and injured workers. One of his most recent proposals is to reform our state’s workers’ compensation system.

Among the changes, Rauner hopes to:

• Make it harder for employees to claim they were injured traveling to or from work
• Limit damage awards in civil suits

• Reducing the power of labor unions

• Withdraw wage laws for taxpayer-funded construction workers
• Toughen the standards workers must meet to prove their injury occurred on-the-job
• Dramatically reduce reimbursement rates for healthcare centers that treat workers
Opponents of these proposals – most vehemently employee unions – believe this is part of Rauner’s goal to take rights and benefits away from workers in favor of corporations. Opponents also point to the broad changes lawmakers made to the workers’ compensation insurance system in 2011. In total, these changes saved Illinois businesses $315 million in the first few years.

Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan recently held a rare committee relaying the entire meeting with Rauner, so all 118 Illinois General Assembly members can hear testimony on his proposals.

How Workers’ Comp Laws Work Now

Currently, employees must prove their injury occurred during the course of their employment. Businesses often complain that this can make the responsible for covering injuries that are only semi-job-related, such as pre-existing injuries that have been aggravated.

Rauner is proposing to tighten standards so employees must prove that their job was a “major contributing cause” of their injury. Similar efforts to tighten this standard were proposed in 2011, but were blocked by labor unions.

When an employee is injured, their case goes before a board of arbitrators who decide how much and what type of benefits they will receive. Arbiters are licensed attorneys who undergo routine training on ethics, fraud, and best medical practices. At present, these arbitrators use five different factors to determine the award, including medical records, physician notes, and American Medical Association (AMA) Guidelines.

Rauner is hoping to give arbitrators the ability to use AMA guidelines as the ONLY factor in determining how much injured workers are paid. Obviously, this would make workers extremely vulnerable, as their benefits would not be determined by the unique circumstances of their case, but by blanket, standardized guidelines.

House Speaker Madigan explained this perfectly by saying “numbers on paper alone can’t tell the full story of men and women who are hurt at work through no fault of their own … these workers and their families … deserve to have their voices heard.” Injured workers face massive medical bills, lost wages, and potentially losing their life’s savings. Most Illinoisans do not have the resources to see the best doctors, physical therapists or home health aides, or furnish their homes with medical tools.

Rauner is also proposing to cut doctor and hospital reimbursements by another 30% – in addition to the 2011 cuts, which slashed reimbursements by 30%. The Illinois Hospital Association warns that this would impact the quality of care injured workers receive. Less medical care means more people put in nursing homes at the cost of taxpayers – the effects of this are not hard to predict. It would merely shift the responsibility of caring for injured workers onto taxpayers instead of the company that caused the injury.
Continue reading